NVIDIA-NeMo / NVIDIA-NeMo/Gym

Use the term "verification logic" consistently instead "verifiers"

Open Beginner friendly
#387 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

documentation usability
Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.2k
Forks
349
Avg merge
1d 21h
Merged PRs (30d)
318

Description

Use cases, pain points, and background
When users are first introduced to concepts, core components, and terminology it's important to use consistent language. Right now, when you look at

Description:
Align on one term to use for consistency unless a different term must be used. We discussed that "verification logic" is a better term than "verifiers."

Design:

Out of scope:

  • Changing anything in the source code to not use the word "verifiers"

Acceptance Criteria:

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the linked About NVIDIA NeMo Gym, core abstractions, and key terminology pages, then search the GitHub documentation for references to “verifiers.” Update the specified user-facing terminology to “verification logic,” leave source code unchanged, and verify both acceptance-criteria pages use the agreed term consistently.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.