Contribution policy — third-party hosted inference endpoints in nim-skills

Hi BioNeMo team,

We are building Genomic Intelligence, a genome-scale model layer for regulatory genomics workflows. It is served via REST API and MCP, spanning a range of regulatory DNA analysis tasks - promoter and enhancer activity prediction, chromatin accessibility, splice-site prediction, gene expression prediction, and sequence annotation.

The nim-skills/ pattern (a SKILL.md plus a bearer-auth REST call) is a clean fit, so we'd like to contribute a genomic-intelligence-nim skill following your existing conventions. Before we invest, one scoping question:

The existing nim-skills/ target NVIDIA-operated endpoints. Is a third-party hosted inference endpoint run by us in scope for this toolkit?

If yes, we'll open a small PR with a single task first (promoter activity prediction) and expand from there toward a fuller regulatory-variant workflow. If hosted third-party endpoints aren't in scope, we'd welcome your guidance on the integration path you'd prefer.

We're happy to match your preferred skill format and licensing. Would this kind of contribution be welcome?

Review the existing nim-skills/ entries and their SKILL.md files, including the bearer-auth REST-call conventions. The issue is ready for implementation only after maintainers decide whether third-party hosted endpoints are in scope and specify the preferred integration path.