NASA-AMMOS / NASA-AMMOS/slim

[New Process Improvement Proposal]: Standardize Terraform Module Library Aligned with SLIM Best Practices

Open
#207 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
36
Forks
14
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Checked for duplicates

No - I haven't checked

Category

Software Lifecycle - the creation, change, and release of software

Describe the need

With the increasing adoption of Terraform across JPL teams, there's a growing need to standardize IaC (infrastructure-as-code) practices to promote reusability, maintainability, and consistency. I am proposing a centralized Terraform repo that aligns fully with SLIM best practices (modular design, input validation, CI checks, versioning, and documentation).

This will help promote code reuse across multiple JPL projects, ensure infra deployments follow SLIM-aligned best practices, and enable safer deployments via standardized validations and CI integrations (workflows).

Next Steps:

  1. Align with SLIM team on priority and scope.
  2. Determine repo ownership and permissions.
  3. Start with handful of high-impact modules (e.g. VPC, S3, IAM roles, RDS, ECS)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by aligning with the SLIM team on the proposal's priority and scope; the issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Determine repo ownership and permissions, then define the initial high-impact modules, such as VPC, S3, IAM roles, RDS, and ECS. Done means an agreed scope, ownership model, and prioritized starting set.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
terraform
Domain
devops, infrastructure
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.