NASA-AMMOS / NASA-AMMOS/plandev-examples
Evaluate sampled/linear geometry resources for performance
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 3d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
Investigate using sampled or linearized geometry resources to reduce repeated SPICE computation, particularly during simulation and scheduling.
The previous experimental PR included linear-vs-discrete geometry resources and related performance work. Use it as inspiration, but design the solution around the current libraries/geometry and PlanDev resource APIs.
Also consider whether its behavior for plans beginning outside available SPICE coverage is still desirable.
Original PR: https://github.com/NASA-AMMOS/aerie-multimission-models-bb/pull/8
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the original PR #8, then inspect the current libraries/geometry and PlanDev resource APIs. Compare sampled or linearized resources with the current simulation and scheduling behavior, including plans beginning outside SPICE coverage; done means a current-API design that reduces repeated computation and records the desired coverage behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100