ModelEngine-Group / ModelEngine-Group/fit-framework
Waterflow 在多线程竞争情况下，需要考虑增加 volatile 关键字，来避免潜在的数据不同步问题
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
in: waterflow
status: waiting-for-internal-feedback
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 335
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
在检视 Waterflow 代码的过程中，发现有些方法存在 synchronized 的关键字，意味着代码逻辑中存在潜在的并发情况，那么对应的类中的成员变量应该也存在可见性问题，是不是需要全量排查，增加 volatile 关键字，来避免这类问题呢？
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, classes, or tests. Start by locating Waterflow methods that use synchronized, then inspect their shared member variables and the surrounding concurrency behavior. Done requires a defined audit scope, evidence for any visibility problems, and tests or another documented way to verify the changes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- backend, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100