MiniMax-AI / MiniMax-AI/minimax-code
[Feature]: 能否更大胆一些？
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
needs-triage
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 1.3k
- Forks
- 141
- Avg merge
- 2h 45m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Description
Problem / 你遇到的问题
经常出现，它给我几个问题，然后每个问题有a、b、c三个选项，然后它和我说它觉得第一个应该选a，第二个应该选b，第三个应该选c。问我是不是也这么觉得，决定了之后就开干。可问题是，我看了以后，我觉得也应该这么选。但是既然这样，它为什么还要中断问我费这事呢。直接开干不就可以了吗？如果我觉得不妥，我打断它重新选就可以了。这样不是效率更高吗？只要信任建立起来，我更希望它能自主决定，而不是动不动就让我选。
Proposed solution / 期望方案
上面说清了。
Platform / 平台
macOS
Additional context / 补充信息
No response
Before submitting / 提交前确认
- I have searched existing issues.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue requests more autonomous behavior for the macOS coding agent, allowing it to proceed without repeatedly asking for confirmation. No files, tests, or entry points are named, so first locate the confirmation flow and determine how user interruption should work. Done would require an agreed design and tests covering autonomous decisions and user overrides.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- ai, cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100