Question about interacting with minimal smart contracts via MetaMask

### What is this about?

I’m experimenting with very small Solidity contracts (simple counters and basic payable functions) on EVM-compatible networks. From MetaMask’s perspective, are there any best practices to ensure smooth transaction prompts and UX when interacting with very minimal contracts? Thanks in advance!

### Scenario

_No response_

### Design

_No response_

### Technical Details

_No response_

### Threat Modeling Framework

_No response_

### Acceptance Criteria

_No response_

### Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged

- [ ] Engineering (needed in most cases)
- [ ] Design
- [ ] Product
- [ ] QA (automation tests are required to pass before merging PRs but not all changes are covered by automation tests - please review if QA is needed beyond automation tests)
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Legal
- [x] Marketing
- [ ] Management (please specify)
- [ ] Other (please specify)

### References

_No response_

The issue names no repository files, tests, or entry points. First clarify whether a documentation change is wanted and which MetaMask interaction or UX behavior should be documented; done would require an agreed scope and acceptance criteria.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.