MetaMask / MetaMask/metamask-extension
Its missclassification as deceptive request
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 13.2k
- Forks
- 5.6k
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 451
Description
### What is this about?
when users approve USDT to our contract, the Metamask display the "this is a deceptive request" notice, this is definitely a wrong classification.
https://doggy-ai.com/ when we try to buy with our usdt tokens the doggy ai token project gets a warning that this transaction is a scam, we would like to fix this problem as it affects our sales, we have already filed this in metamask and now duplicate it github
DoggyAI ($DOGYAI) introduces a unique fusion of meme
culture and artificial intelligence to the cryptocurrency
ecosystem. By leveraging AI technology and the viral
nature of memes, DoggyAI aims to create a fun, engaging,
and rewarding experience for its community. This white
paper outlines the project's vision, technology, tokenomics,
roadmap, and how to participate in the presale.
Doggy ai official website: https://doggy-ai.com/#faq
Official community link: https://t.me/DoggyAi69
Official Twitter: https://x.com/DOGGYAI69
We have submit several times on the issue reports site, but there has no improve process for days. It is having a negative impact on our sales.
So submit this issue here, please remove the metamask wrong classfication report
Thanks alot!
Expected behavior
No warning should popup in metamask. It is having a negative impact on our sales.
Screenshots/Recording
Severity
Severe, has an negative impact on our project
All users are scared to confirm the transaction due to this error.
Deploy
Staking https://etherscan.io/address/0x5f12240737f5B22F657d6eb9f1e7C1123FF62EF7#code
Sale https://etherscan.io/address/0x53eAF46485cbd3453bbf624e8a20D634f5c2e067#code
We рave problem in both
### Scenario
_No response_
### Design
_No response_
### Technical Details
_No response_
### Threat Modeling Framework
_No response_
### Acceptance Criteria
_No response_
### Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged
- [ ] Engineering (needed in most cases)
- [ ] Design
- [ ] Product
- [ ] QA (automation tests are required to pass before merging PRs but not all changes are covered by automation tests - please review if QA is needed beyond automation tests)
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Legal
- [ ] Marketing
- [ ] Management (please specify)
- [ ] Other (please specify)
### References
_No response_
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No repository file, test, or entry point is identified in the report. Start by reproducing the USDT approval flow from doggy-ai.com and reviewing the linked staking and sale contract addresses alongside MetaMask's issue-report process; done means the warning is independently assessed and, if appropriate, its classification is changed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- blockchain, security
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100