MetaMask / MetaMask/metamask-extension
I don't think loading-status should prevent user action.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 13.2k
- Forks
- 5.6k
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 451
Description
### What is this about?
I don't think loading-status should prevent user action.
I need to check my Activity and Token information, even if they are not accurate, but I need to jump to the corresponding Scan-Explorer via Matemask.
### Scenario

### Design
It is recommended that this be more friendly

### Technical Details
_No response_
### Threat Modeling Framework
_No response_
### Acceptance Criteria
_No response_
### Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged
- [ ] Engineering (needed in most cases)
- [X] Design
- [X] Product
- [ ] QA (automation tests are required to pass before merging PRs but not all changes are covered by automation tests - please review if QA is needed beyond automation tests)
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Legal
- [ ] Marketing
- [ ] Management (please specify)
- [ ] Other (please specify)
### References
_No response_
Contributor guide
Research direction
Reproduce the loading-status scenario in the MetaMask extension and trace the UI entry point that disables or blocks Activity, Token, and Scan-Explorer actions. Use the attached scenario and design images as the behavioral reference; done means those actions remain available during loading while the loading state is shown.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100