MetaMask / MetaMask/contract-metadata

Request to Remove “Malicious Site” Warning for SlerfSwap DApp

Open
#1,577 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
585
Forks
1.4k
Avg merge
2d 8h
Merged PRs (30d)
6

Description

Hi MetaMask team,

We recently launched a new DApp named SlerfSwap, and we’ve noticed that when users attempt to interact or sign transactions via our site, MetaMask displays a “Malicious Site” warning:

🔗 http://slerfswap.com

We believe this may be a false positive, as our smart contracts are fully open-sourced and we’ve taken all standard security precautions. We kindly request a review of our domain and, if appropriate, the removal of this flag.

**DApp Information**
• Project name: SlerfSwap
• Official domain: http://slerfswap.com
• Purpose: Decentralized token swap on Ethereum-compatible chains (currently focused on X Layer)
• MetaMask usage: Wallet connection and transaction signing

**Open-sourced Contract Addresses**
• SlerfSwapV2 Factory: 0x702758afEDBD000A982D5A9845b0B0b32916d97b
• SlerfSwapV2 Router02: 0x04aE0E6364635f307A7c81Bee1F8612C14d19917

All contracts are publicly verified on explorers, and our platform does not contain or serve any malicious content.

We respectfully request your team’s assistance in reviewing and resolving this issue. Please let us know if any additional verification materials or documentation are required.

Best regards,
SlerfSwap Team
📩 official@slerfswap.com

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No repository file, test, or entry point is identified. Start by reviewing the reported domain, SlerfSwap details, and contract addresses against the repository's metadata and malicious-site review process. Done means maintainers have determined whether the warning is a false positive and recorded the appropriate outcome.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
blockchain
Domain
blockchain, security
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
10/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.