should we rename the repository from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 5d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
The repository with the C implementation is currently called sarrac. That was the name used for the v2 C package.
The debian amd RPM packages built from it for version 3 are called metpx-sr3c. As part of the build process for RPMS, one must have the directory containing the package match the package name, so need to override the destination on every clone when making RPM packages.
I am wondering if it would be cleaner to rename the package to be *metpx-sr3c*
Having the name of the C package *sarrac* be a substring of sarracenia, causes mild confusion.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing the RPM and Debian packaging workflow and the repository/package-name references; the issue is complete only when the rename decision and its impact on package builds are documented or carried through.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- build-system, release
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100