Consolidate AutoAssess variables
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 3
- Avg merge
- 5d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Are these variables used within AutoAssess as these names? If not, would it be possible to use the Cylc variables directly, please 😊 This will save creating / maintaining duplicate variables, and it's clear from the Cylc variable what the variable is describing 👍
Originally posted by @ehogan in https://github.com/MetOffice/CMEW/pull/361#discussion_r2965551527
Also:
- https://github.com/MetOffice/CMEW/pull/361#discussion_r2965556339: Consider how to remove the dependency on
SUITE_IDandREF_SUITE_ID - https://github.com/MetOffice/CMEW/pull/361#discussion_r2965602655: Consider whether the inheritance can be added more globally via
inc/autoassess.cylc
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the AutoAssess variable definitions and references, with particular attention to the discussion in PR #361 and inc/autoassess.cylc. Compare the existing names with the Cylc variables, investigate removal of SUITE_ID and REF_SUITE_ID, and determine whether inheritance can be moved to inc/autoassess.cylc. Done means the duplicate variables and unnecessary dependency are addressed with the inheritance approach established.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- devops
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100