Replace existing linting tools with ruff
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 10
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
# ✨ Feature Request
We should switch to using ruff as our only linting tool, replacing black, flake8 and isort.
## Requirements
- [ ] Integrate into CI (GitHub actions, pre-commit)
- [ ] Integrate into rose stem / test workflow
- [ ] Configure via cental location: `pyproject.toml`
- [ ] Align where possible with existing ANTS patterns (e.g. use of `noqa`, any existing configuration)
- [ ] Align where possible with UG-ANTS
## Context
We currently use black, flake8 and isort as linting and formatting tools. These can be replaced by a single tool: ruff.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the GitHub Actions, pre-commit, rose stem/test workflow, and pyproject.toml configuration referenced in the requirements. Compare the existing ANTS and UG-ANTS linting patterns, then verify that CI and the test workflow use ruff as the only linting tool and that configuration is centralized in pyproject.toml.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions, python
- Domain
- ci-cd, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100