Availability of LUBM test results
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 114
- Forks
- 18
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Are LUBM test results available for loading, querying, and maybe inferencing? http://swat.cse.lehigh.edu/projects/lubm/
The reason that I ask is that a lot of people see triple-stores as another database like SQL, rather than, as Halyard has done, an RDF schema implemented in a horizontally scalable database like Hadoop/Hbase. This would then provide a quantifiable response to
'I cannot use a triplestore, because I've been told I must use NoSQL/horizontally scalable database'
with
'Yes you can, it is
- hugely scalable (see LUBM results),
- standardized (see w3c standards re RDF, SPARQL),
- well supported (see RDF4J),
- ...
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are mentioned. First determine whether Halyard has existing LUBM loading, querying, or inferencing support; done would require making the relevant test results available or documenting that they are not available.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- hadoop
- Domain
- databases, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100