Integration of additional language models?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 265
- Forks
- 65
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Is there a way to call alternative language models instead of the current one? With several of them emerging in recent literature, it might be handy to have the choice which one is to be used. Example for alternative language model: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14300](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14300 )
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. First map how BioPhi currently selects and invokes its language model, then determine the interface needed for choosing alternatives such as the model linked in the issue; done should include an agreed scope, support for the selected models, and coverage for model selection.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100