Materials-Consortia / Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools
Randomness in the validator
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
ergonomics
needs discussion
validator
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 91
- Forks
- 54
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
From discussion with @markus1978
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue only identifies randomness in the validator and refers to a discussion with @markus1978; no file, test, or entry point is named. Start by finding the validator related to this issue and reviewing that discussion. The expected behavior and completion criteria need to be clarified before implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100