Materials-Consortia / Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools
Funding section in README
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 91
- Forks
- 54
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We may need to add a "funding" section to the README, but it's quite complicated (the funding section to the JOSS is already massive) -- I may have to do this as part of current PSDI-funded work though.
In terms of "major" funders, I would suggest:
- EPSRC, NOMAD, SPW Wallonie (for my contributions 2018-2024)
- PSDI / datalab.industries (for my ongoing work)
- Marketplace, NCCR & SINTEF(?) (for @CasperWA)
- CECAM (for @JPBergsma's work)
with an emphasis on the ongoing funding for maintenance @CasperWA and me, then add a note about other contributors being funded in other ways? Any thoughts @CasperWA?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the repository README and reviewing the existing JOSS funding section for relevant wording. Confirm the major funders and how ongoing maintenance and other contributors should be described; done means the README contains an agreed funding section.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100