Annotations for GitHub Actions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Macaulay2
- Stars
- 435
- Forks
- 297
- Avg merge
- 4d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
We should consider adding [annotations](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/workflow-commands-for-github-actions) to the workflow to make it easier to identify any warnings/errors in compilation or which examples or tests failed.
This would look something like:
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the GitHub Actions workflow responsible for compilation, examples, and tests, then read the linked GitHub Actions annotations documentation. Done means warnings and errors, including failed examples or tests, appear as identifiable workflow annotations rather than only in the log.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- ci-cd
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100