integralClosure
- Dominant language
- Macaulay2
- Stars
- 435
- Forks
- 297
- Avg merge
- 4d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
I think the following is messed up, but can't figure out why.
[Change QQ to ZZ/5 to see something which makes sense and should be a specialization of this.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
R=QQ[f5,f3,g13,g12,MonomialOrder=>Lex];
I=ideal(f5^3+f5*f3+f3^5,f3^4-g12,f5^2*f3-g13);
G=gens gb I;
----------------------------------------------------------------
R0=QQ[f13,f12,MonomialOrder=>{Weights=>{13,12},Weights=>{1,0}}];
phi=map(R0,R,matrix{{0,0,f13,f12}});
f=phi(G_(0,0));
I0=ideal(f);
A0=R0/I0;
icf=icFractions A0; toString icf
time G0=gens gb ideal integralClosure A0;
toString G0
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
The issue names no source files, tests, or entry points and provides only a Macaulay2 reproduction involving integralClosure, icFractions, and Groebner bases. Start by running the supplied transcript and tracing the integralClosure implementation; done means identifying and reproducing the discrepancy and establishing the expected result for the QQ and ZZ/5 cases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100