isNormal for non-equidimensional rings
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Macaulay2
- Stars
- 435
- Forks
- 297
- Avg merge
- 4d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
Currently regular but non-equidimensional rings seem to return false via the isNormal function.
For instance if
R = QQ[x,y,z]/(x_(x+1), y_(x+1))
then isNormal(R) == false
Presumably the issue is that when S2 is checked for, it checks various Exts to see if they are nonzero (and with appropriate dimensional support). Non-equidimensional rings will have Exts in funny dimensions. I suppose one could run this on each connected component separately and then it would be fine.
I guess one should also be careful with the R1 check, if you had X a singular curve disjoint union with a smooth surface, then the singular locus has dimension 0 and the scheme has dimension 2, but I wouldn't say that X is R1.
Best wishes,
Karl
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the isNormal function and reproduce the reported QQ[x,y,z]/(x_(x+1), y_(x+1)) example. Read how its S2 and R1 checks handle Exts, connected components, and non-equidimensional dimensions. Done means the regular non-equidimensional case is accepted while the stated R1 edge case remains correctly classified; no files or tests are named.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100