Deidentification of neurological assessment scores in notes (MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 3.4k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Prerequisites
- Put an X between the brackets on this line if you have done all of the following:
- Checked the online documentation: https://mimic.mit.edu/
- Checked that your issue isn't already addressed: https://github.com/MIT-LCP/mimic-code/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=
Description
Hi,
in our project we are looking at patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) diagnosis; such patients often undergo neurological assessment which includes grading scores such as Hunt and Hess, WFNS, or (Modified) Fisher scale. Such scores are often gathered during admission and reported in the discharge summary. Extracting these scores from free-text notes can be useful for downstream applications.
It seems that the description of these scores in the notes is masked. For example in MIMIC-III, the TEXT field of the entry with HADM_ID=167857 and CATEGORY="Discharge summary" in NOTEEVENTS.csv.gz has the Hess part of Hunt and Hess masked. Further, the subsequent score name in the same entry is completely masked, making it impossible to recover.
In MIMIC-IV, a similar phenomena can be observed, albeit slightly different. For the text field in entry in mimic-iv-note/2.2/note/discharge.csv.gz with note_id=13317644-DS-20, both Hunt and Hess are masked whereas Fisher is not masked.
I wonder if the context-specific rules can be added to the deidentification algorithm, similarly as suggested in #1507 ?
Thanks a lot for your efforts of maintaining and further developing the MIMIC database, it is a great resource!
Best,
Tilman
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the deidentification work referenced in issue #1507 and compare the examples in MIMIC-III NOTEEVENTS.csv.gz and MIMIC-IV discharge.csv.gz. Determine how the algorithm handles the cited neurological assessment names, then define context-specific rules whose behavior is verified against these examples.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- databases, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100