Regarding the availability of 28-day mortality in MIMIC-IV V2.0
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 3.4k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Prerequisites
- Put an X between the brackets on this line if you have done all of the following:
- Checked the online documentation: https://mimic.mit.edu/
- Checked that your issue isn't already addressed: https://github.com/MIT-LCP/mimic-code/issues/1199
Description
MIMIC-IV V2.0 was released on June 12, 2022. The date of death is available within the 'dod' column of the 'patients' table since V2.0, and the maximum follow-up time for each patient is exactly one year after their last hospital discharge. With out-of-hospital follow-up mortality(stop getting death from Social Security Death Index, but purchasing the data from the CDC), MIMIC-IV V2.0 provides a basis for calculating 28-day mortality(same as 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and even up to 1-year mortality, etc.). Some scholars have used 28-day mortality as clinical outcome in their studies with MIMIC-IV V2.0.
Zhu, Z., Zhou, M., Wei, Y. et al. Time-varying intensity of oxygen exposure is associated with mortality in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 26, 239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04114-w
However, I noticed that the source of out-of-hospital mortality was from 'state records’, and I‘m confused with the data source(I'm an ICU physician in China mainland, I am not familiar with the US government institutions), I mean whether the data was from the state CDC(Massachusetts) or the national CDC?
If the survival data come from the CDC of Massachusetts, for after discharge of Non-Massachusetts patients(who come from other states and even from other countries), their follow-up information can be tracked and recorded by the CDC of Massachusetts? I know the vast majority of patients in MIMIC-IV should be local residents, and only a very small percentage of patients may fall into the category I mentioned above. If out-of-hospital survival data for non-Massachusetts patients could not be tracked, could I exclude this part of non-Massachusetts patients based on certain fields(for example, insurance from admissions or other fields)?
As it's important for the clinical outcome of our project, I am interested in whether metrics such as 28-day mortality can be used in MIMIC-IV V2.0. In other words, I would like to ask whether the state(Massachusetts?) CDC data cover the vast majority of patients for out-of-hospital survival information enough. If there are only a few are not covered, the impact of those few can be ignored?
In summary, 28-day mortality as the clinical outcome can be used in MIMIC-IV V2.0?
@alistairewj
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the MIMIC-IV 2.0 documentation and the linked issue #1199, then review the description of the patients.dod column and the stated source of out-of-hospital mortality as state records. Done means documenting whether 28-day mortality is supported and how coverage of non-Massachusetts patients should be interpreted.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- databases, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100