LuaLS / LuaLS/lua-language-server
__pairs and __ipairs metamethods have incorrect annotations
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lua
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 442
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
How are you using the lua-language-server?
Visual Studio Code Extension (sumneko.lua)
Which OS are you using?
Windows
What is the issue affecting?
Annotations
Expected Behaviour
lua-language-server should specify correct function signatures for __pairs and __ipairs.
lua-language-server should in particular say that the __ipairs iterator generator function has 3 return values.
Following the annotation hints for __ipairs should not result in runtime errors.
Given that generic for k, v in pairs(t) --or ipairs(t) for pairs and ipairs are equivilant to:
do
local f, s, var = pairs(t) --or ipairs(t)
while true do
local k, v = f(s, var)
if k == nil then break end
var = k
<block>
end
end
I believe these are the required function signatures:
__pairs =
GEN_FUN(ITERABLE)
RETURNS
ITER_FUN(ITERABLE,KEY)
RETURNS
KEY
VALUE
ITERABLE
KEY_BEFORE_FIRST
OR nil
__ipairs =
GEN_FUN(ITERABLE_ARRAY)
RETURNS
ITER_FUN(ITERABLE_ARRAY,INDEX)
RETURNS
INDEX OR nil
VALUE
ITERABLE_ARRAY
INDEX_BEFORE_FIRST
OR nil
which I believe should be:
---@field __pairs (fun(t):((fun(t,k):(any,any)),any,any))|nil
---@field __ipairs (fun(t):((fun(t,k):((integer|nil),any)),any,integer))|nil
Actual Behaviour
__pairs annotation specifies the iterator function as taking a third argument, for the value. Lua versions 5.2 and 5.4 do not pass a third argument to the iterator function.
---@field __pairs (fun(t):((fun(t,k,v):any,any),any,any))|nil
__ipairs annotation specifies the iterator function as taking a third argument, for the value. Lua version 5.2 does not pass a third argument to the iterator function.
__ipairs annotation specifies the generator function as returning only 2 results. Following the annotation hinting results in nil being implicitly passed as the third argument, instead of the correct index.
---@field __ipairs (fun(t):(fun(t,k,v):(integer|nil),any))|nil
Reproduction steps
t = setmetatable({1,2,3}, {
__ipairs = function(t) local function iter(t, k) k = k + 1 local v = t[k]; if v then return k, v end; end; return iter, t, 0 end,
})
for k, v in ipairs(t) do
print(v)
end
(field) __ipairs: function|nil
function (t: any)
-> fun(t: any, k: any, v: any):integer|nil
2. any
function __ipairs(t: any)
-> function
2. unknown
3. integer
Annotations specify that at most 2 return value(s) are required, found 3 returned here instead.Lua Diagnostics.(redundant-return-value)
Removing the extra return value as the annotation suggests results in :
.\sample.lua:2: attempt to perform arithmetic on local 'k' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
.\source.txt:2: in function 'for iterator'
.\source.txt:5: in main chunk
[C]: in ?
Additional Notes
The example __ipairs sample is essentially what AI generated sample code looks like, so it is likely how someone would use __ipairs.
Lua 5.2 allows iteration with __ipairs to start at any point; this is useful if __ipairs is used to support non-standard ipairs iteration, such as starting from a negative index or starting at some arbitrary positive index, controlled by altering the third return value from the generator function to be a non-zero value.
Some of the __ipairs choices in the suggested annotations I made aren't technically explicitly mandated, but I feel they are in the spirit of the intended functionality; nothing stops anyone violating the implicit assumption that the keys are sequential, have numeric indexes, or they will be traversed in a given order:
t = setmetatable({a=1,b=2,c=3}, {
__ipairs = function(t) local function iter(t, k) return next(t,k) end; return iter, t, nil end,
})
for k, v in ipairs(t) do
print(k, v)
end
I kept my suggested annotation for __ipairs in line with the normal behaviors of ipairs when there is no __ipairs metamethod.
Log File
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the __pairs and __ipairs annotation definitions and run the supplied Lua reproduction in the lua-language-server environment. Compare the inferred signatures with Lua 5.2 and 5.4 iteration behavior. Done means the annotations accept the three generator returns, model the iterator arguments and returns correctly, and no longer produce the shown diagnostics or runtime error.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- lua
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100