LinuxSuRen / LinuxSuRen/open-source-best-practice
思考：开源社区（项目）中，到底怎么才能算是“共建”
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Smarty
- Stars
- 416
- Forks
- 31
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
以下是部分人多国内一些所谓“共建”行为的评价
* 很多人在谈“共建者”，但实际却看不到是怎么“共建”的
* 某些人理解的共建就是来给我免费打工
* 反正我只提供平台，你们赶紧来共建
* 在他们的认知里 contributor 都是天神下凡，自己就能解决一切问题
## 参考链接
* https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XjlmOrHcc2ZO-5lCrZBoHg
* https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Tg411K7KS?p=1
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with issue #92 and its WeChat and Bilibili reference links. The issue frames a discussion about what counts as community co-building but names no file, entry point, or concrete change. An agreed scope and acceptance criteria are needed before a contributor can identify a verifiable done state.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100