Lightning-AI / Lightning-AI/pytorch-lightning
Examples for OPT, just like benchmark on minGPT
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 31.4k
- Forks
- 3.8k
- Avg merge
- 6d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
### Description & Motivation
I found that pytorch-lightning tested support for DeepSpeed's ZeRO and other methods based on minGPT. However, considering the use of large models, we often use **OPT models**.
When I used the minGPT test, I verified that the GPT model with more than 40B parameters can be trained on 4 A10s. However, training based on the OPT-30 model provided by huggingface will cause GPU memory overflow. I consider whether the current support has stricter requirements on the implementation of the model structure. Can you provide examples of using the OPT-30 or other OPT models?
### Pitch
In fact, I just want an official demo that runs OPT-30 (other OPT models are also available) based on "--strategy deepspeed_stage_3_offload". Because I don't know if my usage is reasonable.
### Alternatives
_No response_
### Additional context
Below is my code for testing OPT-30:
The command to execute the code is:python test.py --gpus 4 --strategy deepspeed_stage_3_offload
```python
from argparse import ArgumentParser
from pytorch_lightning import Trainer
from pytorch_lightning.strategies import DeepSpeedStrategy
from pytorch_lightning.utilities.meta import init_meta_context
from torch.utils.data import DataLoader
import pytorch_lightning as pl
import torch
from deepspeed.ops.adam import DeepSpeedCPUAdam, FusedAdam
from itertools import chain
from datasets import load_dataset
from transformers import (
OPTForCausalLM,
AutoTokenizer,
default_data_collator,
)
from typing import Optional
def getDataset():
raw_datasets = load_dataset("wikitext", "wikitext-2-v1")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("facebook/6.7b")
column_names = raw_datasets["train"].column_names
text_column_name = "text" if "text" in column_names else column_names[0]
def tokenize_function(examples):
return tokenizer(examples[text_column_name])
tokenized_datasets = raw_datasets.map(
tokenize_function,
batched=True,
num_proc=1,
remove_columns=column_names,
load_from_cache_file=False,
desc="Running tokenizer on dataset",
)
def group_texts(examples):
# Concatenate all texts.
concatenated_examples = {
k: list(chain(*examples[k])) for k in examples.keys()}
total_length = len(concatenated_examples[list(examples.keys())[0]])
# We drop the small remainder, we could add padding if the model supported it instead of this drop, you can
# customize this part to your needs.
if total_length >= 1024:
total_length = (total_length // 1024) * 1024
# Split by chunks of max_len.
result = {
k: [t[i: i + 1024]
for i in range(0, total_length, 1024)]
for k, t in concatenated_examples.items()
}
result["labels"] = result["input_ids"].copy()
return result
lm_datasets = tokenized_datasets.map(
group_texts,
batched=True,
num_proc=1,
load_from_cache_file=False,
desc=f"Grouping texts in chunks of {1024}",
)
return lm_datasets["train"]
class OPT(pl.LightningModule):
def __init__(self,
optmodel,
weight_decay=0.1,
betas=(0.9, 0.95),
learning_rate=3e-4,
):
super().__init__()
self.model = optmodel
self.weight_decay = weight_decay
self.betas = betas
self.learning_rate = learning_rate
def configure_optimizers(self):
no_decay = ["bias", "LayerNorm.weight"]
params_decay = [p for n, p in self.named_parameters(
) if not any(nd in n for nd in no_decay)]
params_nodecay = [p for n, p in self.named_parameters() if any(
nd in n for nd in no_decay)]
optim_groups = [
{"params": params_decay, "weight_decay": self.weight_decay},
{"params": params_nodecay, "weight_decay": 0.0},
]
# todo: need to enable deepspeed cpu adam only if offloading
if self.deepspeed_offload:
return DeepSpeedCPUAdam(optim_groups, lr=self.learning_rate, betas=self.betas)
return FusedAdam(optim_groups, lr=self.learning_rate, betas=self.betas)
@property
def deepspeed_offload(self) -> bool:
strategy = self.trainer.strategy
if isinstance(strategy, DeepSpeedStrategy):
config = strategy.config['zero_optimization']
return config.get('offload_optimizer') or config.get('offload_param')
return False
def forward(self, input_ids: torch.LongTensor = None,
attention_mask: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
labels: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,):
output = self.model.forward(input_ids=input_ids,
attention_mask=attention_mask, labels=labels)
return output
def training_step(self, batch, batch_idx):
input_ids = batch["input_ids"]
attention_mask = batch["attention_mask"]
labels = batch["labels"]
output = self(input_ids=input_ids,
attention_mask=attention_mask, labels=labels)
loss = output.loss
return loss
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = ArgumentParser()
parser = Trainer.add_argparse_args(parser)
parser.add_argument('--learning_rate', default=6e-4, type=float)
parser.add_argument('--block_size', default=128, type=int)
parser.add_argument('--batch_size', default=1, type=int)
parser.add_argument('--num_workers', default=0, type=int)
args = parser.parse_args()
# one line of poem is roughly 50 characters
train_dataset = getDataset()
train_loader = DataLoader(
train_dataset, collate_fn=default_data_collator,
batch_size=args.batch_size, num_workers=args.num_workers
)
model = OPTForCausalLM.from_pretrained("facebook/opt-6.7b")
with init_meta_context():
model = OPT(model)
trainer = Trainer.from_argparse_args(
args,
max_epochs=10,
gradient_clip_val=1.0,
precision=16,
)
trainer.fit(model, train_loader)
```
cc @borda @awaelchli
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No repository files or tests are named. Start from the provided test.py example and the `--strategy deepspeed_stage_3_offload` command, then compare the OPT model setup with the minGPT benchmark described in the issue. Done means an official OPT example is available and its expected execution behavior is documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- distributed-systems, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100