LaTeX-Package-Repositories / LaTeX-Package-Repositories/endnotes
Conflict between endnotes package and a user-defined note environment
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{endnotes}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\theoremstyle{definition}
%\newtheorem{note}{Note}
\begin{document}
\endnote{Blabla}
\theendnotes
\end{document}
It's an issue that only appeared once \end... started to be a thing. I'm not sure about a good solution, but possibly testing that \endnote has its original defintion could help; the test could be added to the begin/end document and/or \theendnotes.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by running the supplied MWE with the commented \newtheorem{note}{Note} enabled, comparing it with the working version. Investigate the \endnote, \theendnotes, and begin/end-document behavior; done means the user-defined note environment and endnotes package work together without the naming conflict.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- latex, tex
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100