host:port

Nobody has claimed this yet.

```
--- a/beget_msgpack/request_factory.py
+++ b/beget_msgpack/request_factory.py
@@ -18,8 +18,13 @@ class RequestFactory:
"""
В зависимости от имени сервера и его конфига, возвращаем ему соответствующий класс запроса.
"""
+ override_port = None
self.logger.debug('RequestFactory: get_request for server: %s', server_name)

+ server_name_split = server_name.split(':')
+ if len(server_name_split) == 2:
+ [server_name, override_port] = server_name_split
+
# проверяем конфиг на наличие настроек для сервера или настроект по умолчанию
if server_name in self.config.servers:
self.logger.debug('RequestFactory: find server in config')
@@ -60,7 +65,7 @@ class RequestFactory:
self.logger.debug('RequestFactory: return fcgi request')

return FcgiRequest(host,
- server_config['port'],
+ override_port or server_config['port'],
server_config['script_dir'],
server_config['script_name'],
server_config['secret'])
@@ -72,7 +77,7 @@ class RequestFactory:
raise ConfigError(error_msg)
self.logger.debug('RequestFactory: return msgpack request')

- return MsgpackRequest(host, server_config['port'])
+ return MsgpackRequest(host, override_port or server_config['port'])

else:
error_msg = 'RequestFactory: don`t have information about type connection for server'
```

The issue only provides a proposed diff for beget_msgpack/request_factory.py, so start by reading RequestFactory.get_request and how FcgiRequest and MsgpackRequest receive their ports. Confirm the expected host:port behavior and identify the relevant existing tests before making changes. Done means host:port inputs work while configured ports continue to work when no override is provided.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.