LR-POR / LR-POR/PorGram

eliminate types exclusively based on semantics

Open
#73 1 comment 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@leoalenc is already working on this.

Since Feb 4, 2022.

bug
Dominant language
Common Lisp
Stars
3
Forks
1
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

O tipo vol-verb-lex, criado por meio do questionário, não inclui nenhuma especificação adicional em relação ao tipo mais alto que-subj-cl-verb-lex, de que é descendente. Isso provocou a geração de ambiguidade espúria:

~/hpsg/por$ grep -En "^querer" *.tdl

control-verbs.tdl:24:querer_2 := inf-trans-first-arg-control-verb-lex &
lexicon.tdl:285:querer := vol-verb-lex &
random-sample-156-entries.tdl:1061:querer_3 := trans-verb-lex & ; MIC
sample-1647-entries.tdl:5671:querer_4 := que-subj-cl-verb-lex &

O objetivo desta issue, relacionada a #43, é corrigir esse problema.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.