LAMPSPUC / LAMPSPUC/ControlPowerFlow.jl
Generalize Control for PowerModels Exact formulations: ACP, ACR and IVR
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Maybe there's a problem with variable names changing across formulations
Ex: Controlling pd is surely different
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files or tests are named. First inspect the control entry points and variable naming for the ACP, ACR, and IVR formulations, then compare how pd and other controlled variables are resolved. Done should mean control works consistently across the three formulations without relying on formulation-specific names.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100