Koenkk / Koenkk/zigbee2mqtt

[New device support]: Aqara FP400

Open
#33,146 5 comments 4 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

new device support
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
15.7k
Forks
2k
Avg merge
18h 55m
Merged PRs (30d)
35

Description

Link

https://us.aqara.com/products/spatial-multi-sensor-fp400

Database entry

0x54ef4410018d95e3

Zigbee2MQTT version

2.14.1

External definition
import * as m from 'zigbee-herdsman-converters/lib/modernExtend';

export default {
    zigbeeModel: ['lumi.models.4447_8295'],
    model: 'lumi.models.4447_8295',
    vendor: 'Aqara',
    description: 'Automatically generated definition',
    extend: [m.deviceEndpoints({"endpoints":{"1":1,"2":2,"3":3,"4":4,"5":5,"6":6,"7":7,"8":8,"9":9,"10":10}}), m.occupancy({"endpointNames":["1","3","4","5","6","7","8","9","10"]}), m.identify(), m.illuminance({"endpointNames":["2"]})],
};
What does/doesn't work with the external definition?

Presence

Notes

No response

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the existing device-definition entry points and comparable Aqara definitions, then compare them with the supplied external definition for model lumi.models.4447_8295 and its endpoint mapping. Verify the device is recognized from database entry 0x54ef4410018d95e3 and that the supported presence behavior works as expected.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript, typescript
Domain
embedded-iot
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.