KitwareMedical / KitwareMedical/dicom-anonymizer
Support for "Retain Safe Private Option"
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 144
- Forks
- 58
- Avg merge
- 1d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
We are interested in preserving private fields that are known to be safe to keep - as described in https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part15.html#sect_E.3.10
Is there a way to specify private fields with a private creator (e.g., `(7053,xx00) | Philips PET Private Group`) in the DICOM fields definition?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Read the linked DICOM Part 15 section E.3.10 first, then inspect how the DICOM fields definition currently represents private creators. Done means the definition can specify a private creator and retain the corresponding private fields safely during anonymization.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- security, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100