"Devices" Information Descriptors format

We faced some problems with updating the Information Descriptors section for sycl::device. We have three options for how information can be formatted there:

1. In **table** like we did in "Platforms" and "Contexts":

[KHRGA-57_RC_devices](https://github.com/imvucic/SYCL_Reference/tree/KHRGA-57_RC_devices) branch

Pros: Consistency, description added, easy-to-understand structure
Cons: Some names are so long (even if you try to shrink them) that the table becomes enormously wide (still looking for a solution), so the contents will cover it partially. The page becomes very big.

2. Using subsections:

[KHRGA-57_RC_devices_no_table](https://github.com/imvucic/SYCL_Reference/tree/KHRGA-57_RC_devices_no_table) branch

Pros: Description added, full names without removing scopes, easy-to-understand structure
Cons: For consistency, updating "Platforms" and "Contexts" will be necessary. The page becomes very big

3. Leaving the link to the spec, like it was previously:

Pros: The page will become more concise
Cons: No description will be added for "Information Descriptors"

Which option is better? Or are there any other proposals?

Compare the KHRGA-57_RC_devices and KHRGA-57_RC_devices_no_table branches with the current "Devices", "Platforms", and "Contexts" Information Descriptors sections. Review the discussion and decide on a format or proposal; the work is done when the project has a clear decision and the affected reference documentation is updated consistently.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.