KhronosGroup / KhronosGroup/OpenCL-CTS
Test new behaviour around enumeration of custom devices
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 232
- Forks
- 235
- Avg merge
- 8d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 18
Description
See https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Docs/pull/1117
A few ideas:
- Check that custom devices are included in the list reported when using `CL_DEVICE_TYPE_ALL`
- Check that `CL_DEVICE_TYPE_DEFAULT` does return the custom device when it's the only one that belongs to the platform
- Check that `CL_DEVICE_TYPE_DEFAULT` does not return a custom device if there are non-custom devices that belong to the platform
- Any others?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reading the behavior described in OpenCL-Docs pull request 1117, then locate the existing OpenCL-CTS tests for device enumeration. Add coverage for the listed CL_DEVICE_TYPE_ALL and CL_DEVICE_TYPE_DEFAULT cases, and confirm the tests pass for platforms with custom and non-custom devices.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100