Yoko Oh Noes complains about a missing unreachable break statement.

Yoko Oh Noes complains that case 42 is unacceptable, yet case 43 is fine.

/*
- Yoko Oh Noes asks
- "Did you forget a 'break' statement before 'case'?"
- No, I did not.
_/
var x = function(i, j) {
var i;
switch (i) {
case 42:
if (j > 0) {
return (true);
} else {
return (false);
}
/_ break is not reachable here */
case 43:
return ("maybe");
case 44:
return ("could be");
}
};

Reproduce the reported switch statement in the browser-based live coding environment and observe the warning for case 42 versus case 43. Trace the diagnostic that reports a missing break, then verify that the unreachable break is not required while valid fall-through cases retain their expected behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.