JuliaSmoothOptimizers / JuliaSmoothOptimizers/MultiPrecisionR2
Should underflow be allowed for step and candidate ?
Open
question
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The current implementation checks for underflow for step and candidate and returns an error if it happens with the highest precision FP format. Should underflow be allowed, or an option to disable the underflow check added ?
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.