JuliaSmoothOptimizers / JuliaSmoothOptimizers/CUTEst.jl
Possible problem on `contype=L`; verify these problems against SIF
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 61
- Forks
- 23
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The classification tests compare `contype=L` against decoding and counting the linear constraints.
- SIF says these problems have linear constraints, but deconding gives otherwise:
"RDW2D52U", "RDW2D52F", "RDW2D52B", "RDW2D51U", "RDW2D51F"
- Decoding gives linear constraints, but SIF disagrees:
"STEENBRA", "DALLASM", "GRIDNETC", "GRIDNETH", "GRIDNETG", "STEENBRD", "BIGBANK", "GRIDNETI", "LINSPANH", "STEENBRE", "SPANHYD", "GRIDNETE", "GRIDNETF", "STEENBRF", "GRIDNETD", "SMBANK", "LSNNODOC", "DALLASS", "GRIDNETA", "STEENBRG", "GRIDNETB", "STEENBRC", "DALLASL", "WATER", "STEENBRB"
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by examining the classification tests and the SIF, decoding, and linear-constraint counting paths for the listed problems. Compare both groups systematically and document whether each reported discrepancy is a real classification bug or an expected difference; done means the mismatches are explained and the required test or issue updates are identified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100