JuliaPhysics / JuliaPhysics/ThinFilmsTools.jl

Direction for Packagescape?

Open
#1 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
Julia
Stars
35
Forks
5
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

This isn't an issue more of reaching out. I used to do some work with thin films, simulations, etc. What is the over-all direction for this package and it's related ones (TMMOptics, etc)?

Do you plan to support other rigorous methods? It looks like you are working with Fresnel based solutions, but surely others exist (FEM, RCWA, etc).

I may see some room for collaboration if I can get approval from some colleagues to share code I have written during graduate school. If not - I will maybe start from scratch and see how it goes. The code wasn't written in Julia anyways...

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No file, test, or entry point is named; this is a request for project direction rather than an implementation task. Start by reviewing the repository description and existing scope, then seek maintainer guidance on whether additional rigorous methods such as FEM or RCWA are intended before defining any work.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
10/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.