JuliaPOMDP / JuliaPOMDP/DiscreteValueIteration.jl
Option for Setting Gauss-Seidel Value Iteration
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 21
- Forks
- 12
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Currently, the solver only supports Gauss-Siedel value iteration. We should have an optional flag to do value iteration without the Gauss-Siedel method if the user wishes. There are a few ways to do this. The two most straightforward ways:
1. Have two different solver types with their respective solve functions
2. Have a flag that looks something like `gauss_siedel::Bool` as a field in the current `ValueIterationSolver` type without adding another type or `solve()` function.
Can this be done more elegantly? @zsunberg if I recall you were dealing with something similar to this in MCTS, any input here?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.