Branching process Julep
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 75
- Forks
- 23
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We need to figure out how we're going to handle branching going forward. For the immediate future we plan to keep `master` as 1.1, but we will need to figure out how we want to handle breaking changes in the long term.
The key questions
* How to structure our branches?
* What tooling can we use to minimise the need for manual intervention with handling backports?
* What should get backported to minor and patch releases?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing the three questions in the issue: branch structure, tooling for backports, and what belongs in minor and patch releases. Done means the project has an agreed long-term branching and backport policy; no files or tests are identified in the payload.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- release, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100