JuliaInterop / JuliaInterop/JavaCall.jl
union would crash after init
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 125
- Forks
- 53
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
after using JavaCall; JavaCall.init()
the following code would crash
union([1 for a in 1:1000]...)
(after using JavaCall and before JavaCall.init() won't)
linux 4.19.2
julia version 1.0.1
JavaCall v0.7.1
ldd julia:
linux-vdso.so.1
libjulia.so.1 => /usr/bin/../lib/libjulia.so.1
libdl.so.2 => /usr/bin/../lib/libdl.so.2
librt.so.1 => /usr/bin/../lib/librt.so.1
libpthread.so.0 => /usr/bin/../lib/libpthread.so.0
libc.so.6 => /usr/bin/../lib/libc.so.6
libLLVM-6.0.so => /usr/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM-6.0.so
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/bin/../lib/julia/libstdc++.so.6
libm.so.6 => /usr/bin/../lib/libm.so.6
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/bin/../lib/julia/libgcc_s.so.1
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the shown union expression after JavaCall.init() on the reported Julia and JavaCall versions. Read the JavaCall.init entry point and trace the initialized runtime's interaction with this expression; the report names no source file or test. Done means the expression no longer crashes after initialization, with a regression check for this case.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java, julia
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100