JuliaGraphs / JuliaGraphs/GraphsBase.jl
Testing an implementation of the interface
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 11
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Once users implement an AbstractGraph, they need an easy way to make sure that all of the methods are correctly defined. For instance a test suite that we provide.
And we need a way to make sure that said test suite is correct: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/metatesting-jl-who-tests-the-test-suites/99273
Related: https://github.com/JuliaGraphs/Graphs.jl/issues/253
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the AbstractGraph interface and the related Graphs.jl issue #253, then review the linked Discourse discussion about testing test suites. Define what methods the supplied suite must validate and how its own correctness will be checked; the issue is complete when both concerns have an agreed implementation and coverage.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100