JuliaGraphs / JuliaGraphs/Graphs.jl
Possible unintended reversion for (weighted) katz centrality?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 538
- Forks
- 128
- Avg merge
- 10h 25m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Katz Centrality is restricted to bool types which prevents use with weighted graphs, an issue that was previously raised in LightGraphs.jl
https://github.com/sbromberger/LightGraphs.jl/issues/1423
That particular issue was resolved by https://github.com/sbromberger/LightGraphs.jl/pull/1428
but the resolution does not seem to have made it over in the transition to Graphs.jl
Is there a reason for this?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file or test is named. Start by locating the Katz Centrality implementation and compare its weighted-graph handling with LightGraphs.jl issue 1423 and pull request 1428; done means determining whether the Graphs.jl behavior is an unintended reversion and documenting or correcting it accordingly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100