JuliaGraphs / JuliaGraphs/GraphNeuralNetworks.jl
coverage not properly reported
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
maintainance
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 308
- Forks
- 74
- Avg merge
- 3d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
The coverage of the repo is much larger than the one displayed in the codecov badge in the readme.
The problem is with GNNlib being underreported, since most of its lines are not tested directly but only indirectly when testing GNN.jl layers.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by inspecting the Codecov badge in the README and how coverage is collected for GNNlib versus GNN.jl layers. Determine why indirectly tested GNNlib lines are underreported, then verify that the displayed repository coverage matches the actual coverage after the reporting change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100