JuliaGeometry / JuliaGeometry/GeometryBasics.jl

Static analysis of a Type

Open
#31 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
215
Forks
64
Avg merge
3d 18h
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

In GeometryTypes there were a series of functions (vertextype, facetype) useful in extending calls to AbstractMesh.

These were pretty useful for avoiding calls to convert. Is similar functionality possible in GeometryBasics?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by comparing the GeometryTypes functions vertextype and facetype with the GeometryBasics types, especially how they support AbstractMesh calls without convert. Determine whether equivalent static type functionality fits GeometryBasics and define the intended API and completion criteria before making changes.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
computer-graphics
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.