Naming inconsistencies in generic dense cuSOLVER functions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 1.4k
- Forks
- 281
- Avg merge
- 1d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 30
Description
Describe the bug
There are some naming inconsistencies in the generic dense cuSOLVER API, where some Xroutine functions are wrapped instead as routine.
Xsytrs
https://github.com/JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl/blob/a9a687cf541c1cdc91e0b6884382f6fd57ceb417/lib/cusolver/src/dense_generic.jl#L125
https://github.com/JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl/blob/a9a687cf541c1cdc91e0b6884382f6fd57ceb417/lib/cusolver/src/dense_generic.jl#L152
Xtrtri
Xlarft
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open lib/cusolver/src/dense_generic.jl at the linked lines for Xsytrs, Xtrtri, and Xlarft. Compare the wrapper names with the generic dense cuSOLVER API naming described in the issue. Done means the affected functions use the consistent Xroutine names throughout their wrappers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 78/100