Comparison of calculation speed

Open
#130 18 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
20/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
julia
Domain
data, performance

Research direction

Start with the comparison details in the linked RP_Speed_Test repository and review how RecurrenceAnalysis.jl performs against the other implementations. The issue does not name files, tests, or a specific calculation to change, and it does not define a clear completion condition; establish the performance target and affected entry points before proceeding.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

documentation performance

I did some comparison of the calculation speed for RPs and simple RQA. More details at https://github.com/pucicu/RP_Speed_Test. The Julia implementation (RecurrenceAnalysis.jl) is (surprising to me) not the fastest one.

Computation speed for recurrence plots and recurrence quantification measures for the Rössler system.

Have fun! 😁

Norbert

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
50
Forks
16
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from JuliaDynamics/RecurrenceAnalysis.jl

All issues in JuliaDynamics/RecurrenceAnalysis.jl

Similar issues

More Julia issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.