JuliaDynamics / JuliaDynamics/ABMFrameworksComparison
Comparison to DynamicGrids.jl
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- NetLogo
- Stars
- 27
- Forks
- 11
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
For fixed grid models like forest fire, DynamicGrids.jl was around two orders of magnitude faster than Agents.jl the last time I checked.
It also has a good range of visualisation tools - REPL, GTK and web outputs. Also live parameter manipulation. It might be nice to mention that in the docs where you are comparing the forest fire model with mesa.
It wont run a lot of the models you define here, but it's pretty specialised for high-performance gridded models.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the documentation passage comparing the forest fire model with Mesa and read its surrounding context. Add a comparison to DynamicGrids.jl, including its performance for fixed-grid models and visualization or live parameter features described in the issue. Done means the documentation presents this comparison accurately and clearly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100