JuliaDocs / JuliaDocs/DocStringExtensions.jl

Upstream to Base?

Open
#92 4 comments 5 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
126
Forks
35
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

The manual says:

This package provides a collection of useful extensions for Julia's built-in docsystem. These are features that are still regarded as "experimental" and not yet mature enough to be considered for inclusion in Base, or that have sufficiently niche use cases that including them with the default Julia installation is not seen as valuable enough at this time.

What would be needed to be considered mature enough for upstreaming this package to Base?

Ref: https://github.com/julia-vscode/julia-vscode/issues/1427

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the manual passage quoted in the issue and review the linked julia-vscode issue for upstreaming context. No file or test is named; done would require an agreed, documented set of maturity criteria or a concrete upstreaming plan.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.