JuliaDiff / JuliaDiff/ForwardDiff.jl
Relax requirement that all partials have to be of the same type
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 160
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Sometimes it's useful to take different partials with different precisions or take some partials symbolically. Unfortunately, the assumption that partials are all of the same type is baked pretty deep into the library at the moment.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by tracing how the library represents and combines partials, then identify the assumptions that require all partials to share one type; done means supporting partials with different precisions and symbolic partials without breaking existing behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100