JuliaDiff / JuliaDiff/Diffractor.jl
Very poor performance on simple taylor function
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 453
- Forks
- 33
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In Chris' recent SciML video, at this timestamp he showcases a little AD benchmark. Summarizing, differentiating the function:
function taylor(x, N)
sum = 0 * x
for i = 1:N
sum += x^i / i
end
return sum
end
Shows pretty poor performance in Diffractor. I've created a gist that contains a Project, Manifest and test script to showcase the issue. You can increase N to get harder and harder problems. Note that I was unable to get Enzyme working on master (perhaps I need to check out the master branch) and Diffractor dies with a stack overflow if N is too large.
For N=10^4, we get timings of Enzyme's code running in <1ms, and Diffractor taking more than 300ms. Zygote and ForwardDiff are both well under 10ms.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked gist's Project, Manifest, and test script, and run the Taylor benchmark with N=10^4. Compare Diffractor's timing and stack behavior with the Enzyme, Zygote, and ForwardDiff results described in the issue. Done means the benchmark no longer shows the reported severe slowdown or stack overflow.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100